I’m happy observe eHarmony responding inside their recognized web log to articles named “Marriage-Maker Claims Are Tied in Knots ” from the Wall Street log. The WSJ post examines many of the relationship research launched by adult dating sites like eHarmony plus the methodology used to determine such statistics. We spoke a bit about it subject also, a few weeks ago whenever initial WSJ post ended up being posted (see tale).
The WSJ article didn’t look to kindly from the stats launched by internet dating sites, and also for the most part I buy into the writer. The general public ought knowing exactly how these stats tend to be generated. Of all dating sites discussed in WSJ article, “eHarmony sticks out as one of the more cautious types”. This is not precisely a glowing document for eHarmony therefore, they chose to upload a reply on their weblog.
During the eHarmony article they’re going into more information on how they calculated that their unique dating site was actually accountable for 2percent of marriages in the United States, from 12-month period stopping March 2007. All the information we already understood about from a previously circulated PDF file called “eHarmony | Harris Interactive 2007 wedding Metrics few eHarmony Marriages” (see Story), nevertheless the article really does clean out some more details. What this website post really does tv show is actually, eHarmony is wanting to be as open and clear due to their investigation results as you can. I believe the name “Open telecommunications” may undoubtedly end up being your best option when it comes to formal eHarmony blog.
Here’s the full eHarmony a reaction to the Wall Street Journal about how they assess their unique relationship statistics. For additional information regarding this dating website, read our very own report on eHarmony.